I've been wanting to post about Obama's speech to the students for a while. This is my position that I put as a reply to a post on one of my Oakcrest MyFamily sites. Then, as another guest post, I will post what Tracie wrote. I am really proud of the way that she expressed herself.
When we started getting emails from the district about permission slips going out for the speech, based on the outcry from the video in Davis district, I was really surprised. Well, I guess because we're in Utah, I wasn't that surprised. But I guess you could say frustrated. I understand the irritation and frustration about the video, from what I understand it had some influential celebrities which adds to the influence it would have. I don't know much more than that. But when it comes to a nation-wide address from the president, I think that is a different thing. I was talking to my dad about it on Monday and he is a serious Obama non-supporter and gets all of his information from talk radio. He was saying things that he had heard about the socialist ideas that Obama would be sharing with the students and I think he even mentioned that someone went so far as comparing it to when Hitler started with indoctrinating children. Seriously? I don't agree with Obama a lot of the time and I think he spends too much time in the media when he should be worrying about other things, but I don't think he would ever get away with the nation-wide indoctrination of k-12 students. Is this making sense? I might have to edit it tomorrow. I agree with Kazoo that although we may not agree with him personally, it is important to show respect to the office. And twenty bucks says he didn't write the speech anyway, he has people to do that for him. And there was outcry about the proposed lesson plan and a certain line in the speech, but the line was changed and the lesson plan cut. I do think the lesson plan was weird. I read through the talk the night before online and was really impressed. I was really excited for my students to see it because so many of them are Obama supporters, in my opinion, mostly because it was the "trendy" thing to do. Hate Bush, love anything not Bush. (this is based on my students, not everyone's. And remember I am in SLC district. Totally different than I'm sure Jordan or Davis in it's belief system). With Obama speaking directly to them, a speech just for them, impressing the importance of an education, I think there is absolutely no harm in that. If I was a parent (and I say this now with no kids, it might change when I have them) I would encourage them to listen to the president, knowing that I can support the things I agree in and challenge (and encourage my kids to challenge) the things I don't agree in. But there was nothing I disagreed with in the speech. I don't think kids today can hear too much about the importance of education and knowledge and I think it's really fantastic that Obama places so much emphasis on education. I think that you guys have all had valid points, especially with regard to having the right to stand against it. That's what America is about, freedom of choice; in most things. Does any of this make sense? PS Tracie told me that she was in AP US Government during the speech and her teacher decided that they weren't going to watch it because they were behind in the lesson and needed to catch up. I was absolutely floored, I even used caps in my return text. I would think that especially as a us gov teacher you would grab that opportunity to listen to the president and debate what we are debating right now. She did say he tried to find it later but couldn't find a link to watch it. I couldn't believe it.
From Tracie:Hey gang this is Tracie, Biph's little sister! I'd just like to contribute the opinion of someone directly affected by this, as I am in 12th grade. First of all, my AP Government teacher (who, by the way, didn't put watching it as a priority, and in explanation said, "Stay in school and don't do drugs, that's all he's going to say.") was discussing this with my class, and the point came up about needing permission to listen to the daily teachings of teachers. This is totally true, I have had at least five or seven teachers who are much more worthy of wariness than Obama. Despite some teacher's attempts to be unbiased in their teaching, many end up giving their opinion anyways. Even in a disclosure statement sent home to my parents a couple years ago, a teacher commented that George Bush has a Homer Simpson personality, to which he referred for the rest of the year. Secondly, we need to concentrate on making progress. This means working with people we don't like, finding common ground, and improving our not so perfect country. This is where education comes in. Obama likes it. I like it. We can be friends about it. Maybe not on other issues, but we can't compare apples to oranges. Don't let your previous prejudices affect something that could hinder the future. I think that there is a lot of narrow-mindedness when it comes to Obama, not necessarily here on this site, but in general. He is simply addressing our nation's great need to put education at a higher priority. This is a very important message, and whether you agree with him or not, it should definitely be addressed. Thirdly, we, as children, need to be informed. We can't rely on our parents' political views anymore than we can rely on their testimonies for the rest of our lives. Otherwise I'd wonder why Glenn Beck isn't a General Authority and President and overall Captain of all things bright and beautiful. We need to learn to be critical thinkers, and that doesn't mean the answer gets handed to us. So when Becky said that parents need to explain to their children why they feel that way, she's respecting our ability to think for ourselves. We need parents to guide us with facts, but not blindfold us. Nothing in politics is black and white (haha, pun), so we can't take a staunch position against Obama, because there are good and bad qualities about him. He's our President for a reason, Heavenly Father wouldn't put someone in charge of his promised land if they didn't have something good to bring to the table. But that's just what I think. :)